Current:Home > StocksWisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid -Global Capital Summit
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid
View
Date:2025-04-18 02:22:01
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday on whether a law that legislators adopted more than a decade before the Civil War bans abortion and can still be enforced.
Abortion-rights advocates stand an excellent chance of prevailing, given that liberal justices control the court and one of them remarked on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights. Monday’s arguments are little more than a formality ahead of a ruling, which is expected to take weeks.
Wisconsin lawmakers passed the state’s first prohibition on abortion in 1849. That law stated that anyone who killed a fetus unless the act was to save the mother’s life was guilty of manslaughter. Legislators passed statutes about a decade later that prohibited a woman from attempting to obtain her own miscarriage. In the 1950s, lawmakers revised the law’s language to make killing an unborn child or killing the mother with the intent of destroying her unborn child a felony. The revisions allowed a doctor in consultation with two other physicians to perform an abortion to save the mother’s life.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion nationwide nullified the Wisconsin ban, but legislators never repealed it. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe two years ago, conservatives argued that the Wisconsin ban was enforceable again.
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit challenging the law in 2022. He argued that a 1985 Wisconsin law that allows abortions before a fetus can survive outside the womb supersedes the ban. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, argues the 1849 ban should be enforceable. He contends that it was never repealed and that it can co-exist with the 1985 law because that law didn’t legalize abortion at any point. Other modern-day abortion restrictions also don’t legalize the practice, he argues.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled last year that the old ban outlaws feticide — which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother’s consent — but not consensual abortions. The ruling emboldened Planned Parenthood to resume offering abortions in Wisconsin after halting procedures after Roe was overturned.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court in February to overturn Schlipper’s ruling without waiting for lower appellate courts to rule first. The court agreed to take the case in July.
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin filed a separate lawsuit in February asking the state Supreme Court to rule directly on whether a constitutional right to abortion exists in the state. The court agreed in July to take that case as well. The justices have yet to schedule oral arguments.
Persuading the court’s liberal majority to uphold the ban appears next to impossible. Liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz stated openly during her campaign that she supports abortion rights, a major departure for a judicial candidate. Usually, such candidates refrain from speaking about their personal views to avoid the appearance of bias.
The court’s three conservative justices have accused the liberals of playing politics with abortion.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Hurricane Michael Cost This Military Base About $5 Billion, Just One of 2018’s Weather Disasters
- Hilary Duff Reveals She Follows This Gwyneth Paltrow Eating Habit—But Here's What a Health Expert Says
- In Tennessee, a Medicaid mix-up could land you on a 'most wanted' list
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- With student loan forgiveness in limbo, here's how the GOP wants to fix college debt
- Arctic Bogs Hold Another Global Warming Risk That Could Spiral Out of Control
- Clean Economy Jobs Grow in Most Major U.S. Cities, Study Reveals
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- The impact of the Ukraine war on food supplies: 'It could have been so much worse'
Ranking
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Red and blue states look to Medicaid to improve the health of people leaving prison
- Shell Sells Nearly All Its Oil Sands Assets in Another Sign of Sector’s Woes
- Emotional Vin Diesel Details How Meadow Walker’s Fast X Cameo Honors Her Late Dad Paul Walker
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Spain approves menstrual leave, teen abortion and trans laws
- LGBTQ+ youth are less likely to feel depressed with parental support, study says
- Malaysia wants Interpol to help track down U.S. comedian Jocelyn Chia over her joke about disappearance of flight MH370
Recommendation
DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
Millions of Google search users can now claim settlement money. Here's how.
Have you tried to get an abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned? Share your story
5 Science Teams Racing Climate Change as the Ecosystems They Study Disappear
Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
Taylor Lautner “Praying” for John Mayer Ahead of Taylor Swift’s Speak Now Re-Release
Saving Ecosystems to Protect the Climate, and Vice Versa: a Global Deal for Nature
Iowa Supreme Court declines to reinstate law banning most abortions